But, really, what is $600,000 when Mayweather stands to earn eight figures even after paying Marquez and paying off more than $5 million in IRS debts, especially when all indications are that the pay-per-view is going through the roof and likely will crack 1 million buys? Mayweather also disregarded the Nevada State Athletic Commission’s request for a bout contract (which lists the weight) to be filed in a timely fashion. Instead he waited until just minutes before the weigh-in.” “Now, did two pounds make the difference between Mayweather winning and losing? Probably not. But that still doesn’t make it right for him to run roughshod over everyone, and it sure wasn’t right for everyone around him to facilitate the FRAUD. MAYWEATHER should have been a professional about it and made the weight.”  a consumer I feel as though I have been cheated by Mayweather and find it odd how various parties swept this under the rug for him while he went laughing to the bank.  Very much like Rafael I doubt the 2 lbs would have made any difference in the outcome of the fight, but simply put Mayweather showed an utter lack of respect for JMM and all the boxing fans who paid their hard earned money to watch this fight. I know I will never get my money back, but I for sure won’t be paying anything to watch Mayweather vs Mosley either and I encourage others to boycott the fight to send a message to Floyd.One final note…If Mayweather fans need to feel the urge to bring up Pacquiao and the drug tests I would say this…  it is 100% and completelyirrelevant to this article.  Why?  I am talking about Mayweather and how he committed fraud in regards to the 1 million PPV buys from the fight with JMM.  Mayweather made an actual profit and a sizable one while he commited fraud.  So unless you want to prove you are a street teamer, fanboy or totally illogical keep it to the subject of the article… .

* Q1 loss/shr $0.15 vs EPS $0.14 year ago Stocks  |  Global Markets * Rev falls 20 pct * Cuts 2009 outlook April 30 (Reuters) – Ultralife Corp (ULBI.O), which sellsbatteries and other power-providing solutions, posted aquarterly loss, hurt mainly by order delays and higherexpenses, and it also cut its 2009 forecast. For the first quarter, net loss attributable to Ultralifeshareholders was $2.5 million, or 15 cents a share, comparedwith net income of $2.4 million, or 14 cents a share, a yearearlier. Revenue fell 20 percent to $39.8 million, due mainly tolower shipments of advanced communications systems as ordersreceived in the latter part of 2007 were fulfilled during 2008. Operating expenses were $10.0 million compared with $8.5million a year ago.

Analysts on average were expecting earningsof 12 cents a share, before special items, on revenue of $56.6million, according to Reuters Estimates. “Our fiscal year 2009 has started more slowly than we hadplanned,” Chief Executive John Kavazanjian said, adding thatrelease of government and defense orders are taking longer thananticipated. Severe price competition by component suppliers has putpressures on the margins in the company’s standby powerbusiness, the CEO said. For 2009, the company sees revenue of about $230 million,down from its prior view of $250 million.The company also lowered its operating income estimate toabout $13 million from about $20 million.